America is going back to the moon. Here’s why it’s a big deal - and why you should be OK with the $93 billion cost - ANALYSIS: The historic lunar flyby is the first moon trip in more than 50 years and

NASA’s Artemis program faces delays and soaring costs, now totaling $93 billion, as the agency pushes its moon mission timeline to 2028. Technical issues and schedule setbacks raise concerns about the future of U.

The post NASA's Artemis Program Is a Monument to Government Waste. It Can Only Go Up From Here. appeared first on Reason.com.

NASA's Artemis return-to-the-moon program is years behind schedule and billions of dollars over budget. Could a successful mission quiet its critics?

NASA's Artemis II mission is shaping up to be more than just the next step in returning humans to the moon — it is a key test of whether the agency's traditional contractor-built systems can remain viable in a rapidly ​shifting space industry.

Like the US, China is seeking allies to boost its lunar ambitions. Russia, South Africa, Pakistan, Egypt, Serbia, Belarus and Azerbaijan are among the countries that have backed its plan for an international lunar research station. China also has said it wants to launch crewed missions to Mars and build a permanently inhabited base there.

NASA is set to launch its second mission of its Artemis program, originally schedule for February, this week. During a wet dress rehearsal of the rocket-towering system at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral,

Apollo proved we could go. Artemis must prove we can stay. That will require not just new technology, but a new approach to cost, partnerships, and political durability.

Artemis II, Nasa's first crewed mission around the Moon in over 50 years, has launched successfully and is currently orbiting Earth