The Trump administration plans to stop assigning value to human life when analyzing the costs and benefits of air pollution ...
The EPA won't consider the economic costs of harms to human health, at least for now. Legal and health experts are concerned ...
The Environmental Protection Agency plans on only considering the industrial cost of air pollution, not the human cost, when ...
The EPA “is still considering the impacts that PM2.5 and ozone emissions have on human health, but the agency will not be ...
In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary ...
The Environmental Protection Agency says it will stop calculating the economic savings of health benefits from air pollution ...
An internal email from an EPA supervisor, reported by the New York Times, stated that “to rectify this error, the EPA is no longer monetizing benefits from PM2.5 and ozone.” The agency also confirmed ...
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 99% of the global population breathes air that exceeds recommended pollution limits, contributing to over 7 million premature deaths ...
September 7 is the International Day of Clean Air for Blue Skies. Each year, an estimated seven million people around the world are killed by effects from air pollution, which include cancer, strokes, ...
When indoor air pollutants enter the lungs, they can trigger inflammation and place long-term strain on the heart and ...
Associate Professor Matthew Hobbs receives funding from Health Research Council of New Zealand and the Clare Foundation, New Zealand. Joseph Boden receives funding from the New Zealand Ministry of ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results