A PLOS Biology analysis finds papers led by women spend 7%-15% longer in peer review, a delay that can undermine promotion, funding, and career advancement for clinician-researchers.

AI Scientist, an autonomous research tool, first released in 2024, has now undergone peer review, highlighting its strengths ...

The arrival of AI-generated research papers marks a turning point that could radically accelerate discovery—or drown it in ...

James Zou is a computer scientist at Stanford University who has been exploring how large language models (LLMs) can assist ...

Peer-reviewed research is the gold standard for science. We rely on that system to weed out the discoveries from the detritus. However, growing concerns over how the peer-review system operates are ...

An autonomous AI system has written a scientific paper from scratch and cleared the first round of peer review at a workshop ...

Cone Health is a North Carolina-based nonprofit health system serving patients across 150 locations, including five hospitals and more than 120 physician practices. It had a peer review paper-based ...

The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, ...

A recent article published in Nature highlights the overwhelming number of peer-reviewed research papers that were retracted in 2023. To some, this may appear to be a reason for concern with how ...

This essay is excerpted from a new Chronicle special report, “Building a Faculty that Flourishes,” available in the Chronicle Store. Mention peer review of teaching in a faculty meeting, and you’re ...

What is peer review of teaching (PRT)? Peer review is recognized in academia as a measure for ensuring quality work that meets standards and expectations among experts. Similarly, peer review of ...